BirdCage student directors step down after repeatedly butting heads with UBC Athletics

In less than two years, UBC BirdCage went from a small group of dedicated student sports fans to a campus force, drawing the biggest crowds the school had ever seen for games like Winter Classic and Homecoming.

Now, suddenly, multiple directors have stepped down, meaning the organization is dead for at least the rest of the season. Former leaders say they grew frustrated with how Athletics managed BirdCage. Austin Kretzschmar, the department’s promotions and game day manager, said he did the best he could to work with the students, and was surprised it all fell apart.

After Athletics brought the student sports marketing group under its wing in the fall of 2017, former BirdCage executives say the department didn’t take their ideas seriously and asked directors to do too much for too little money. One says he hasn’t been paid at all, and two others received their cheques in early March for terms ending in February and December.

Jake Rusnak, who founded BirdCage in 2016, said he felt BirdCage was "the lowest priority of Athletics — below having Thunder [UBC’s mascot] show up at some kid’s birthday party.... I’d faithfully characterize it as being shot in the leg and then being told to run a marathon.”

Noah Kussin-Bordo, who took over from Rusnak after he transferred to Arizona State University at the end of 2017, said budget concerns also dampened BirdCage’s ability to generate hype. The team initially charged $30 for a membership, which included a BirdCage hoodie and a season pass to every Thunderbird home game. In 2017 Athletics upped the price to $40, and changed the hoodie to a t-shirt.

“What we saw was there were less people who were buying the season pass and there were less people who really wanted to actually be involved,” said Kussin-Bordo.

Kretzschmar expressed his regret about what he sees as necessary decisions to keep the department fiscally responsible.

“[The hoodies were] just something that we couldn’t continue because it just wasn’t sustainable and financially viable for us to do that,” he said. “We can’t lose a whole lot of money ... investing in certain things that we may not be able to recoup the losses of.”

Kretzschmar also said the working relationship took a hit whenever Athletics couldn’t make a BirdCage idea happen — directors could be all-or-nothing on potential projects.

“If there were situations where we couldn’t green-light budgetary decisions that they had brought to the table, just for obvious reasons, there may have been some deflation on their end and less eagerness to approach us with other ideas,” he said.

Former BirdCage directors also said Athletics worked them too hard for how much they were compensated.

“During this whole time [Athletics is] expecting us to be boothing for events, they’re expecting us to be at games with a full staff, working basically as promotions staff in the game. They only have five or six staff who are dedicated to doing in-game promotions, and those are all paid positions. They were using us as volunteers — sort of a spirit squad,” said Kussin-Bordo, who said it was like “we were doing two full-time jobs.”

Kussin-Bordo said he brought up concerns to Kretzschmar multiple times and was ignored. Kretzschmar said he doesn’t remember hearing about the workload ever being a problem.

“We were looking to Athletics ... like, ‘Hey, we need help, we need help. Somebody help us.’ Nothing,” he said.

Another former BirdCage director, Jeff, who asked to be identified with a fake name as he said Athletics still owes him money, agreed that BirdCage felt like Athletics’ last priority.

“The way Athletics has treated us, it always seemed like we were on the brink of getting shut down, even though we’ve done more for the program in increasing student attendance and student involvement than Blue Crew or anyone else has,” he said. “They’ve consistently not delivered what they've promised in terms of support, in terms of pay, in terms of helping us develop this program.”

Kretzschmar said his door was “literally always open” and he was responsive to any of the directors’ concerns, though because BirdCage was only part of his portfolio, it couldn’t always be his primary focus.

“I certainly never wanted to have an iron fist over the operations of the BirdCage and I really wanted them to operate independently, but within the parameters that we have to set with budgetary constraints, because it is a budget the university’s providing, so it has to be used or not used in particular ways,” he said.

Eventually, Kussin-Bordo said, it was too much.

“My entire staff said, ‘We don’t want to come back,” he said. “Having looked at the expectations of Athletics and the lack of support, they all came to the conclusion [that] there was no reason.”

Payment was also a problem for the directors. Rusnak said he was paid $1,500 per school year — one $750 cheque per term — and the four staff under him each got $1,200. For 2016, he said he received his first cheque two weeks into the second term. He said he had to follow up with Athletics multiple times to get paid for his second term, which ended in March, 2017. He said he finally did, in July.

For the rest of 2017, Rusnak and Kussin-Bordo say they were paid last week.

Kussin-Bordo said his pay was based on a “handshake deal” and that Athletics didn’t have him sign an agreement.

“We were just given basically a verbal list of expectations of, ‘Here’s how I want you to behave at games, here’s how we want you to work and here’s what you’re going to do,’” he said.

Kretzschmar said he submitted their payments in early December, 2017 and blamed UBC’s financial system for the sluggishness.

Kretzschmar stressed that BirdCage isn’t dead — Athletics will be interviewing students to take over leadership before September.

“I see potential for the BirdCage, and I definitely want to work on succeeding and drawing that potential,” he said. “It’s something that we’re very eager to execute and execute well.”

Rusnak said he would love to see BirdCage get back on its feet, but for that to happen, Athletics will need to take student input more seriously.

“The whole idea behind all of this was that students are best at advocating for themselves, and students are best at supporting themselves. And so the moment that transfers from students is the moment it dies,” he said. “The very first meeting we had as BirdCage, there was a toast at the very end — it was to when Athletics eventually thinks that they know what they’re doing, and they kill this.”