Though UBC’s response to the danger in Japan has been swift, at least one student isn’t happy to be sent back home.
UBC decided Friday to send 19 students from what the Canadian government has deemed level three and four risk areas in Japan back home in urgency. The flights have been arranged and paid for by Go Global, and their return is mandatory.
Elsa Chanez, a student who was on exchange at Sophia University in Tokyo, said she feels she has been given no options. “I do understand their decision, but when I see that my European friends are given the choice to either stay or go, I feel patronized. I have no voice and it’s a bit upsetting.”
Chanez said it is hard to watch the news in Tokyo and wonder if the decision they made was too rash. She had been told the decision would be made on March 21 rather than on the 19th.
“Some of my friends in Tokyo are telling me the situation is fine and that we could have come back with no problems. Once again, we cannot be too sure but I feel time would have been able to tell us. But we were not given the option to wait.”
Janet Teasdale, senior director of Student Development and Services, recommended on March 17 to require UBC students to return home under Policy C69, which gives the university the right to remove students from high risk areas overseas.
“I think you see all universities, all organizations, all governments working to get their citizens and students out of the area,” she said. “We also look at the assessment other countries make—Italy, France, the UK—these countries have different kinds of ways of making these assessments. Some are more or less conservative.”
Teasdale said the level of urgency increased with the nuclear reactor situation at Fukushima. Those who are not in high risk areas will be allowed to stay, but also assisted if they choose to return home.
“We really quickly removed any barriers so that if a student anywhere in Japan wanted to return home or to Canada, they could do that immediately,” she said. Students that were taking advantage of Japan’s mid-semester break to travel throughout Asia were asked to remain where they are and not to return to Japan.
After the quake, Chanez’s parents flew her to Hong Kong temporarily. When she was contacted by Go Global, she discovered that she was not allowed to return to Japan at all to pick up her belongings or say good-bye to her friends and was to immediately fly back home to Marseilles.
Chanez said that her year in Japan was the best of her life, and she was upset at having to leave so suddenly. “I tried arguing with the advisor but she said the ‘situation was final.’ Since I left Tokyo in a hurry, all my belongings are still there. I could not say good-bye to my friends, I still have a bank account and a phone to take care of—these may seem trivial but [they] will become annoying things in the future,” she said.
Teasdale said that while the university is working with Japanese counterparts to ensure the safe return of belongings, the scale of UBC’s actions is unprecedented.
“[Of] decisions in the past ten years, we have never refunded tuition, arranged for travel and required students to leave an area,” she said. “For the most part, the students have been great in understanding the situation and quickly mobilizing themselves in what is a very distressing situation for many of them.”
Students who were planning to leave for Japan were asked to remain home. For these students, and those who were going to start their second semester in Japan in April, it means a semester of classes will be lost.
“We all just lost a semester since we cannot take courses at UBC now until the summer semester,” said Chanez.
Teasdale said the university still made the best decision for the safety of students.
“The university moved quickly and appropriately. Obviously there are some students who are upset that their ideas of studying abroad so quickly ended. But we can work with them on alternate arrangements and alternate plans.”




I think it’s good enough that they want their students to be safe, BUT in the end, they should be offered a choice, because we are FREE INDIVIDUALS and ADULTS!!! and we should be able to choose for ourselves!
I think it’s GREAT that they PAID for the trip back! but I think it is SO unfair that they could not choose when to leave or at least get to say goodbye to their friends! it’s really unfair that they will not be given a chance to go back to Japan even after it all calms down!!
I wasn’t even offered a ticket back home! I had to pay for the whole thing myself! STINKING DANISH GOVERNMENT!
How is this “mandatory return” enforced? I understand why the decision to recommend students leave Japan was made, and I can see how they can make the return flight, tuition reimbursement, and even their status in the exchange program contingent upon leaving under their terms (and that those who don’t leave should be considered to have absolved UBC and/or Go Global of any liability).
Policy 69 says that the University can “suspend or cancel any funding to the Student from sources controlled by the University”, and that the head of an academic unit can “impose such other restrictions as the Head of Unit feels are warranted by the situation” – what does this mean in practice? Would the University really revoke scholarships or withdraw students from degree programs for choosing when they want to leave Japan (given that they probably don’t have courses back in Vancouver they need to rush back to)? And if so, would that be a reasonable response on the part of the University?
The students at Universities in the US had their programs cancelled, depending on the school, but often teh students had to pay the cost of the return flight on their own, and then because of certain regulations(and receiving financial aid for a semester they were withdrawn from) they had owed a certain amount of money to the University. usually around 4k-5k USD. Anyway UBC students should not complain. Their American counter-parts got screwed over a lot worse over a decision their respective universities made.