The provincial government wants a rapid-transit line to UBC.
Those along Broadway and West 10th don’t want a Canada Line-style shutdown of their neighbourhood.
It was with that backdrop that the Business and Residents Association for Sustainable Transportation Alternatives (BARSTA) held a meeting on June 22 to debate alternatives to a Skytrain line that would extend to UBC.
“In my view we have two alternative futures,” said Jan Pierce, Chair of the West Kitsilano Residents Association, to the crowd of about 150 people that filled the St. James Community Square.
“One looks to retain much of our existing housing, green space, heritage, and have change happen in a more gradual way that fits with our neighbourhoods.
“The alternative, a rapid-rail skytrain system, where our neighbourhood goals are transformed by the development goals of Translink, using the excuse of perceived need to increase ridership on their extremely expensive lines to justify the high costs.”
Mel Lehan, co-founder of BARSTA, began the meeting arguing that the speed of the line should not be Translink’s main consideration.
“We want to make some suggestions about transit alternatives that would be best for not only improving transit, but for respecting and enhancing our communities and local businesses,” said Lehan, who was the provincial NDP candidate for the Vancouver-Point Grey riding in 2005 and 2009.
After Lehan, a variety of merchants, academics, and city planners gave presentations to the crowd, each decrying the costs and effects of a Skytrain line. Patrick Condon, a Landscape Architecture Professor at UBC, told the crowd that based on his research, the $2.8 billion the provincial government has pledged for a UBC Line could instead be spent on a streetcar system that would span the entire city.
The majority of speakers spoke with the assumption that a Skytrain was the preferred option of Translink, which is currently studying the various options available for the 12 kilometre route from the university to Commercial and Broadway.
Ken Hardie, Translink’s Director of Communication, denied the charge. “I honestly don’t know where they got that idea that a SkyTrain is the front-runner,” he told The Province. “We are looking at a variety of options.”
But Susan Heyes, a Cambie Street merchant who was awarded $600,000 in damages by the BC Supreme Court last year—the case is being appealed by the government—argued that Translink and government are ignoring the lessons learned through the Canada Line construction.
“They’re holding open houses, which is not meaningful consultation,” she said, adding “what’s happening along here is exactly what happened on Cambie street.”
And while she granted that some UBC students would favour the fastest option, “If you’re talking about the difference between 15 and 20 minutes to get [to UBC]…it’s irrelevant. I think the larger concern is what consequences will happen as a result of the project,” said Heyes.
“We should care deeply about what happens to your environment, and stop thinking so small…it’s the long-term well being of neighbourhoods and cities at stake.”
(+4 rating, 2 votes)
Loading ...
It’s a sad day in Vancouver when NIMBYs like these are allowed to quash a line that has been in dire need for over 15-20 years. I take it that residents are content with exponential increases of cars on the road, poor transportation planning, and LRTs that cut right through the north-south streets intercepting Broadway as opposed to a Skytrain that will serve the community for the next generation.
I’m also not too sure where Heyes is getting her numbers from. The difference is not in 5 minutes; it is measured in tens of minutes (and sometimes, even an hour). Need further proof? I’m sure 50,000 commuters on the 99 can tell her that. Of course, she does know her numbers – she saw her business was going bankrupt out of her own decision-making and found a scapegoat in the RAV.
I used to work at a restaurant on Cambie during the construction of the skytrain, so I’m aware of the problems that arose from the project. I admit it was tough on business, there’s no hiding that fact, but the benefits associated with the Canada Line far outweigh the social costs that the Cambie area endured. The Canada Line benefits Metro Vancouver as a whole, and to go back to my Philosophy 101 days, it’s better to do what is best for the greatest amount of people.
To argue that the push for a Skytrain is only based on speed is incredibly ignorant. Yes, a skytrain option would be the fastest, but there are other advantages other than speed, such as reliability/frequency and safety. Mentioning of accidents with LRT systems are much more common than with Skytain-like systems. Check out Youtube for videos dedicated to LRT crashes. Even the Olympic Line collided with a vehicle within a week of its first run.
The existing 99 B-Line would be better than an LRT line and that’s saying something. I challenge the members of the associations mentioned in the article to travel from Commercial Station to UBC at 8am, then wait at the bus loop at UBC in the rain at 3pm to travel back.
Do the members of the West Kitsilano Residents Association not believe that lrt needs construction too??? Pretty sure the construction of lrt would disrupt business along Broadway just like a skytrain would… If anything, lrt would be even more disruptive if you include complications after construction. I lived in Toronto, I’ve seen what those stupid street trains can do to traffic..
Also, as great as public input is, sometimes the government’s gotta do what the government’s gotta do…
I went to one of Translink’s public consultation events in May in West Point Grey. I was deeply appalled at how the residents in that neighbourhood opposed the UBC Line. Many of them even criticised the existence of the 99 B-line, saying that it is purely useless for local residents and blaming UBC and the rest of the city for somehow imposing on their precious streets. Some even suggested to put the transit line on 16th Ave with no stations between UBC and VGH, because they never want to see UBC students. But in essence, their objection was simply based on the fact that most of these residents never take transit. They all live in single-family dwellings and own at least a car and garage. They were firing concerns at Translink about the loss of parking spaces and lanes on Broadway. The only environmental concern of these residents is the upkeep of their front lawns; they could care less about the city’s GHG emissions. They constantly argue that rapid transit will destroy the neighbourhood’s character; but what character is that, I would like to ask, a character of suburbia? This is Vancouver, a place that desperately need affordable housing. We can no longer tolerate this kind of inefficient, irresponsible, low-density use of precious land. We students at UBC must act and show the west-side neighbourhoods that our voices will be louder, and let them realise that they need to think about the greater good for the city.