Uncategorized

SPHR: Palestine’s right to exist

by omar chaaban & dina el-kassaby
Contributors

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

Despite the political manoeuvring of Western leaders, despite their attempts to complicate the issue, the “question of Palestine” is simple: Does Palestine have a right to exist?

Without a doubt, the answer is yes. But it is important to realize that there should never have been a question of Palestine’s right to exist in the first place. Prior to the mass expulsion of roughly 800,000 Palestinians (according to Israeli sources), and before the unilateral declaration of the state of Israel on May 14, 1948, Palestinians made up at least 66 per cent of the population of the region. 90 per cent of the Jewish population was of foreign origin, including tens of thousands of illegal immigrants.

The concept of national self-determination as defined by international law grants Palestinians the right to a sovereign state of their own. Overlooking this basic right, and against the wishes of Palestinians, the international community adopted UN General Assembly Resolution 181. This called for the internationalization of Jerusalem and Bethlehem, the creation of a Jewish state on 56 per cent of Palestine and a Palestinian state comprised of the rest.

The Arabs, understandably and legally, rejected the plan, which contravened the terms of the League of Nations British Class A Mandate. David Ben-Gurion, head of the Jewish Agency, accepted the Partition Plan, but he made it clear that he viewed it as a first step in taking over even more of Palestine for a Jewish state.

The anti-Palestinian narrative maintains that Arabs and Palestinians were at fault for rejecting the Partition Plan. No mention is made of the fact that the UN General Assembly was in the process of shelving the Partition Plan in favour of a UN Trusteeship for Palestine when Ben-Gurion and others declared the Jewish state. It’s not surprising that Palestinians rejected the scheme, which had no legal foundation, in which 56 per cent of their ancestral homeland would be granted to a minority immigrant population.

Sixty-two years have passed since the plan to partition Palestine, and politicians continue to label the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as complicated. But the solution is simple: there is an occupation, and it must end.

Palestinians (including Hamas) and the Arab League have accepted binding UN Security Council Resolution 242, which despite Israel’s contrary claims, calls for Israel’s return to the borders of June 4, 1967 as per the UN Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Fourth Geneva Convention, etc.

As declared by the rest of the world and the International Court of Justice, Israel maintains an illegal occupation of East Jerusalem, including its illegally extended boundaries, the West Bank, the Gaza Strip (still occupied under international law) as well as Syria’s Golan Heights and Lebanon’s Sheba’a Farms.

If Israel truly wants peace and recognition, these occupations must end. Furthermore, we should not forget that before the UN General Assembly and the Lausanne Peace Conference in 1949, as a pre-condition for UN admittance, it was accepted that Israel must comply with UN General Assembly Resolution 194, which calls for repatriation of and/or compensation for Palestinians dispossessed during the 1947–49 war.

As for Jerusalem, Palestinians have made it clear that they are willing to share it with Israel as a joint capital. Reiterating that occupation is necessary for the protection of Israeli civilians, that the apartheid wall is being built for “security measures,” or the lie that Palestinians will continue to engage in violent acts even after attaining statehood is counterproductive, and serves no purpose other than to forestall the peace process.

In defiance of the entire world, including the US, Israel continues to construct illegal settlements in occupied lands. At the same time, the apartheid/de facto annexation wall continues to snake through the villages and towns of the occupied West Bank, expropriating land and water resources and creating only misery for Palestinians who must travel for hours to reach their workplaces, farms and schools.

For 62 years, the so-called leaders of the “free world” have looked the other way while Israel has continued to victimize Palestinians. It is time for them to listen to the rapidly increasing numbers of ordinary people everywhere who are demanding that Palestinians be granted their inalienable human rights.

Omar Chaaban is the president of Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights (SPHR) and Dina El-Kassaby is SPHR’s VP of public relations.


Share/Save/Bookmark

8 comments

  1. Sarah Dec 1

    “Palestine” does not exist and has never existed in the course of human history.

    That part of the world has been occupied by various empires throughout the past 2,000 years when the Jews were expelled by the Romans, thus creating the Jewish diaspora.

    The Jewish people are the natives to that land, not the Arabs or Muslims. Thousands of years before Mohammed was even born, Jews lived in what is today Israel and the West Bank.

    Up until World War I, it was the Ottoman Empire that controlled that land and after the War it was the British Empire who controlled it. It was the British who promised the Jewish people a homeland there and in 1948 the UN voted to partition the land into an Arab state and a Jewish one.

    The Jews accepted it and the Arabs did not and attacked the Jews thus starting the conflict in earnest.

    There are already 22 Arab states and 56 Islamic ones. Why can’t the Arabs accept a tiny Jewish state in their midst?

    The sickening anti-Semitism of the Arab world and of groups like the SPHR are a reminder that anti-Semitism did not die in that bunker alongside Hitler some 64 years ago.

    Reply

    Palestine Reply:

    A very clear, consise and right text.
    An end of the occupation is the only solution. A free Palestine from the mediterranea to the Jordan see will bring peace to Jews, Christians and Muslims palestinians living there.
    The Khazars should weak up: they do not belong to this place, they should stop stealing the land, return to where they come from and they should pay for their crimes.

    Reply

    Fahim Reply:

    “A free Palestine from the mediterranea to the Jordan”

    This sentiment, so freely denying Israel’s right to exist, is all too common in Arab and Muslim rhetoric.

    The occupation will end when Palestinian terrorism ends.

    Reply

    Nick Reply:

    Yes! Because claiming Palestinians have a right to exist, and a place to live is pretty much the same as wanting to exterminate an entire race. Thank you for proving Godwin’s law in just one step!

    Reply

  2. Hmm Dec 1

    “Does Palestine have a right to exist?”

    Yes.

    “the ‘question of Palestine’ is simple”

    No.

    Reply

  3. Amar Dec 2

    Jordan is the real Palestine. Those expelled were not inhabitants of the Land, but rather people working the lands. The land was bought fair and square from the owners in Beirut and Dimashk. Nice try on the ownership. Its a shame the biggest export from Palestine is whining.

    Reply

  4. Rag Dec 3

    “The sickening anti-Semitism of the Arab world and of groups like the SPHR are a reminder that anti-Semitism did not die in that bunker alongside Hitler some 64 years ago.”

    This repetition of this “argument” is seriously weakening the IAC case.

    Critique of Israel is not anti- semitism.

    In a constructive debate a separation between the state of Israel and the religion/people of judaism needs to be clear.

    Reply

Leave a reply